Answering inline ..
On 21.02.2018 23:48, Dan Haywood wrote:
I've updated the doc to conform with current code behavior and fixed the
logic of the particular test.
> What happens with auditing, is there a discrepancy there too, I wonder?
No discrepancy here ... Auditing behaves according to doc: falls back to
'enabled', if invalid or missing configuration
> On Wed, 21 Feb 2018 at 21:08 Andi Huber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi Dan,
>> I'm in the processes of fixing some tests in module metamodel on the
>> 'master' branch.
>> If I interpret the doc  correctly, then we have a discrepancy between
>> doc and current implementation:
>> Given (invalid or missing) configuration property
>> according to the doc should be picked up by the framework equivalently to
>> If there is no configuration property in isis.properties then publishing
>> is automatically enabled for domain objects.
>> But in code we do the opposite (isis.services.publish.objects=none).
>> Which way should it be?
>> Cheers, Andi