Java-Grok IS java regex. It is just a DSL over Java regex. It takes grok
expressions ( that can reference other expressions and be compound ) and
parses/resolves them and then builds one big regex out of them.
Also, Groks, once parsed / used are re-used, so at that point they are like
That is not to say that that takes 0 time, but it may help you to
On July 11, 2018 at 07:13:38, Muhammed Irshad ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Thanks a lot Kevin for replying. Which thread are you mentioning ? The
stackoverflow link ? I could not see any such option.
On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 3:04 PM, Kevin Waterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Like the thread says, the two regex engines are wildly different,
> you can increase the threads using -w option in grok to increase the
> On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 5:35 PM Muhammed Irshad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Hi All,
> > I am trying to write Java custom parser for parsing AD logs. I am
> > log flow of 10 million AD events per second. Is using Java regex to
> > benefit over using Grok parser in terms of performance ? Is there any
> > performance benchmark or insights regarding the same ?
> > I found this stackoverflow
> > <
> > https://stackoverflow.com/questions/43222863/logstash-
> > >
> > question which inspired me for this post.
> > --
> > Muhammed Irshad K T
> > Senior Software Engineer
> > +919447946359
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Skype : muhammed.irshad.k.t
Muhammed Irshad K T
Senior Software Engineer
Skype : muhammed.irshad.k.t