No, it wouldn't. SkyWalking as the APM, having more complex protocol than other two. I have tried to do format transform, read Zipkin receiver, there is an experimental feature there. But in all practices, it is not suitable for production.
> yeah, I see the explain( > > https://github.com/apache/skywalking/blob/master/docs/en/FAQ/why_mq_not_involved.md > ) > But, > If Oap server before MQ , Data format conversion module after MQ, > Skywalking will be completely compatible with other software ,for example: > zipkin, jaeger ,or the other soft which supported opentrace. > > On Sun, Jan 19, 2020 at 9:26 AM Sheng Wu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > Hi Geek > > > > Which part? I think the document has explained why there isn't such a > > mechanism in the upstream. > > > > Sheng Wu 吴晟 > > Twitter, wusheng1108 > > > > > > Geek Tcp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 于2020年1月19日周日 上午9:22写道： > > > > > Hi ! > > > I see the structure on the site: > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/skywalking/blob/master/docs/en/FAQ/MQ-involved-architecture.png > > > > > > Will Skywalking support MQ in future? > > > > > >