Add to this, it seems like TAJO-1724[^1] and TAJO-1951[^2] was originally
aimed to be fixed in 0.12.0 but still not on progress. Could you change
their (expected) fix version to later one? And if there is anyone who is
working on those issues, I would like to take them.
On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 10:11 PM, Dongjin Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
*Software developer in Line+.So interested in massive-scale machine