Subject: [DISCUSS] Change 'master' branch to something else?

For our mainline development branch, I am also fine with following the lead
of the "upstream" git community on this decision. I have seen "develop"
used in a number of places, which I like, but I also have no concerns with

For the test-patch default, maybe we omit a default value going forward and
require the user always provide it. For that matter, if we make this value
available as an environment variable, a project can specify it's default
branch name via personality file.


On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 8:15 PM Sean Busbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: